Data is now the most valuable commodity in the world. Whether we intend to or not, we produce data on ever increasing levels on a daily basis. As the largest single employer in the ACT, the ACT Government has an obligation to place apt governance structure around this data, and fence it doe the benefit of its producers.
As technology and AI further develop, they are being more and more entrenched in the Public Service and the way in which we operate. As they evolve they will undoubtably yield efficiencies. While these efficiencies will be generated by the technological advances, they cannot occur without human input – input that can and must be recognised by the public service as a generated efficiency and applied back to those workers.
Additionally, through the everyday nature of the work public servants undertake, they generate data. Whether this is policy, projects, research, or even through their actions such as such as location, movement, efficiency, hours worked, sick days and vacations. Where the data is of a personally generated by workers, they must retain ownership, control and / or governance over their products. This should include apt recognition and acknowledgement of the data produced.
Where this data is utilised by the employer to generate an income stream (ie data provided for research) this revenue should be fed back into the budget as a specific employee entitlement.
General Resolution
Tracking of data ownership and sovereignty in the ACTPS
ACT Labor Conference calls on the ACT Government to investigate, and implement where appropriate, apt tracking of data ownership and data sovereignty within the ACTPS.
The ACT Government should examine this data, or products produced, and where they generate an efficiency (such as AI or technological advancements), provide the value of this efficiency back to employees as an employee entitlement.
Where the data is used for other means (Ie research, or statistical analysis such as the ROGS report) it should be correctly attributed to the producers of said data (ie academic recognition etc), and if compensable, fed back into the budget for employee entitlements.
The collection and administration of these programs should be open, accountable, and transparent.